Best Cloud Regions for Australia and New Zealand
DailyCloud regions ranked by lowest median latency to Australia and New Zealand, based on the latest day's measurements across 900+ cities worldwide. Compare AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle, Tencent, Huawei and Alibaba to pick the fastest region for Australia and New Zealand.
| Rank | Provider | Region Name | Avg Latency | Median Latency | Loss | Cities | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GCP | Sydney(AU) | 23.5ms | 23.4ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | AWS | Sydney (AU) | 23.5ms | 23.5ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 3 | Azure | New South Wales | 23.7ms | 23.6ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 4 | Azure | Auckland | 23.9ms | 23.9ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 5 | Oracle | Sydney (Australia) | 30.1ms | 30.1ms | 1.7% | 4 | 4 |
| 6 | Oracle | Melbourne (Australia) | 31.2ms | 31.0ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 7 | AWS | Melbourne (AU) | 31.2ms | 31.1ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 8 | GCP | Melbourne(AU) | 32.7ms | 32.5ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 9 | GCP | Tokyo(JP) | 133.2ms | 133.0ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 10 | Azure | Hong Kong SAR | 144.9ms | 144.8ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 11 | Azure | Tokyo, Saitama | 145.9ms | 145.2ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 12 | GCP | Osaka(JP) | 150.3ms | 150.2ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 13 | Tencent | Hong kong(CN) | 155.1ms | 154.0ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| 14 | GCP | Seoul(KR) | 155.6ms | 155.5ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 15 | AWS | N. California (US) | 157.5ms | 157.0ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 16 | GCP | Changhua County(TW) | 158.0ms | 157.8ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 17 | GCP | Hong Kong(HK) | 157.8ms | 157.8ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 18 | AWS | Oregon (US) | 158.0ms | 158.0ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 19 | Azure | Singapore | 173.6ms | 173.5ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 20 | Azure | Kuala Lumpur | 176.9ms | 176.5ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
Updated: 2026-09-04arrow_backBack to global leaderboards