Best Cloud Regions for Australia and New Zealand
DailyCloud regions ranked by lowest median latency to Australia and New Zealand, based on the latest day's measurements across 900+ cities worldwide. Compare AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle, Tencent, Huawei and Alibaba to pick the fastest region for Australia and New Zealand.
| Rank | Provider | Region Name | Avg Latency | Median Latency | Loss | Cities | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Azure | New South Wales | 22.3ms | 22.2ms | 0.0% | 6 | 6 |
| 2 | AWS | Sydney (AU) | 22.5ms | 22.4ms | 0.0% | 6 | 6 |
| 3 | Azure | Auckland | 22.9ms | 22.9ms | 0.0% | 6 | 6 |
| 4 | Oracle | Sydney (Australia) | 23.9ms | 23.9ms | 0.0% | 6 | 6 |
| 5 | Oracle | Melbourne (Australia) | 24.1ms | 24.1ms | 0.0% | 6 | 6 |
| 6 | GCP | Sydney(AU) | 37.6ms | 37.5ms | 0.0% | 6 | 6 |
| 7 | AWS | Melbourne (AU) | 44.7ms | 44.7ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 8 | GCP | Melbourne(AU) | 73.9ms | 73.8ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 9 | AWS | N. California (US) | 148.7ms | 148.5ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 10 | AWS | Oregon (US) | 150.0ms | 150.0ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 11 | GCP | Tokyo(JP) | 151.4ms | 151.1ms | 0.0% | 6 | 6 |
| 12 | GCP | Osaka(JP) | 151.2ms | 151.4ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 13 | Alibaba | Silicon Valley (US) | 154.1ms | 154.0ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 14 | Azure | Hong Kong SAR | 160.2ms | 160.4ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 15 | Azure | Kuala Lumpur | 164.3ms | 164.3ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 16 | GCP | Changhua County(TW) | 167.0ms | 167.2ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 17 | GCP | Hong Kong(HK) | 169.9ms | 170.2ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 18 | GCP | Seoul(KR) | 172.9ms | 172.8ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 19 | AWS | Tokyo (JP) | 177.7ms | 177.7ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 20 | Azure | Tokyo, Saitama | 181.3ms | 179.4ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
Updated: 2026-10-15arrow_backBack to global leaderboards