东亚 最快云区域排行 — 2026 年 6 月
月度按到 东亚 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于 2026 年 6 月、全球 1000+ 城市的全部测量数据，每月 1 日发布上月排行。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 东亚 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | ASN 数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GCP | Changhua County (TW) | 32.2ms | 30.8ms | 0.0% | 27 | 0 | 263 |
| 2 | Azure | Hong Kong (HK) | 36.0ms | 34.6ms | 0.1% | 37 | 0 | 281 |
| 3 | Oracle | Seoul (KR) | 39.8ms | 36.8ms | 0.0% | 27 | 0 | 272 |
| 4 | AWS | Hong Kong (HK) | 39.6ms | 39.7ms | 0.1% | 37 | 0 | 232 |
| 5 | Alibaba | Seoul (KR) | 46.9ms | 40.6ms | 0.3% | 39 | 0 | 367 |
| 6 | AWS | Tokyo (JP) | 43.3ms | 40.9ms | 0.1% | 39 | 0 | 368 |
| 7 | Tencent | Hong Kong (HK) | 46.7ms | 41.4ms | 0.4% | 37 | 0 | 230 |
| 8 | AWS | Osaka (JP) | 44.8ms | 41.8ms | 0.3% | 39 | 0 | 374 |
| 9 | Azure | Tokyo (JP) | 44.0ms | 43.1ms | 0.2% | 37 | 0 | 377 |
| 10 | Azure | Seoul (KR) | 45.1ms | 43.1ms | 0.2% | 37 | 0 | 330 |
| 11 | GCP | Osaka (JP) | 46.1ms | 43.2ms | 0.1% | 27 | 0 | 271 |
| 12 | Alibaba | Tokyo (JP) | 53.2ms | 43.4ms | 0.8% | 39 | 0 | 337 |
| 13 | Tencent | Tokyo (JP) | 55.1ms | 43.7ms | 0.3% | 39 | 0 | 368 |
| 14 | Tencent | Seoul (KR) | 57.7ms | 49.0ms | 0.3% | 37 | 0 | 320 |
| 15 | Oracle | Tokyo (JP) | 55.6ms | 50.2ms | 2.1% | 37 | 0 | 329 |
| 16 | AWS | Seoul (KR) | 53.5ms | 50.4ms | 0.1% | 39 | 0 | 370 |
| 17 | Alibaba | Hong Kong (HK) | 59.7ms | 52.9ms | 0.1% | 28 | 0 | 191 |
| 18 | Azure | Singapore (SG) | 55.8ms | 55.3ms | 0.1% | 37 | 0 | 224 |
| 19 | AWS | Taipei (TW) | 60.6ms | 60.3ms | 0.1% | 37 | 0 | 298 |
| 20 | Tencent | Singapore (SG) | 69.1ms | 60.7ms | 2.1% | 32 | 0 | 163 |
排行月份: 2026 年 6 月 · 更新于: 2026-11-03arrow_back返回全球排行榜