中亚 最快云区域排行 — 2026 年 8 月
月度按到 中亚 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于 2026 年 8 月、全球 1000+ 城市的全部测量数据，每月 1 日发布上月排行。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 中亚 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | ASN 数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AWS | Stockholm (SE) | 83.5ms | 83.2ms | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 26 |
| 2 | Tencent | Frankfurt (DE) | 87.0ms | 83.8ms | 0.4% | 2 | 4 | 19 |
| 3 | GCP | Hamina (FI) | 83.8ms | 85.0ms | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 35 |
| 4 | AWS | Frankfurt (DE) | 88.2ms | 87.6ms | 1.5% | 3 | 6 | 34 |
| 5 | GCP | Warsaw (PL) | 90.1ms | 88.4ms | 0.0% | 3 | 7 | 28 |
| 6 | Oracle | Frankfurt (DE) | 89.0ms | 88.8ms | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 18 |
| 7 | GCP | Stockholm (SE) | 87.7ms | 90.2ms | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 38 |
| 8 | Azure | Zurich (CH) | 90.9ms | 90.8ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 9 | Azure | Frankfurt (DE) | 93.9ms | 92.4ms | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 33 |
| 10 | Azure | Amsterdam (NL) | 93.4ms | 92.9ms | 0.3% | 3 | 6 | 27 |
| 11 | GCP | Eemshaven (NL) | 94.0ms | 93.2ms | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 17 |
| 12 | Oracle | Amsterdam (NL) | 102.1ms | 93.6ms | 0.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 13 | GCP | Berlin (DE) | 107.1ms | 94.3ms | 0.6% | 2 | 5 | 27 |
| 14 | Azure | Vienna (AT) | 96.9ms | 94.4ms | 2.4% | 3 | 6 | 27 |
| 15 | GCP | Frankfurt (DE) | 95.2ms | 94.6ms | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 18 |
| 16 | Azure | Milan (IT) | 97.7ms | 94.9ms | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| 17 | Alibaba | Frankfurt (DE) | 97.5ms | 95.4ms | 0.0% | 3 | 7 | 16 |
| 18 | Azure | Warsaw (PL) | 95.8ms | 96.5ms | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 19 | AWS | Paris (FR) | 112.3ms | 96.7ms | 1.7% | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| 20 | Azure | Oslo (NO) | 98.0ms | 97.3ms | 0.4% | 2 | 4 | 9 |
排行月份: 2026 年 8 月 · 更新于: 2026-11-03arrow_back返回全球排行榜