东亚 最快云区域排行 — 2026 年 8 月
月度按到 东亚 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于 2026 年 8 月、全球 1000+ 城市的全部测量数据，每月 1 日发布上月排行。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 东亚 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | ASN 数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GCP | Changhua County (TW) | 33.4ms | 27.4ms | 0.2% | 8 | 11 | 122 |
| 2 | GCP | Hong Kong (HK) | 29.0ms | 28.4ms | 0.1% | 8 | 11 | 128 |
| 3 | Huawei | Hong Kong (HK) | 30.4ms | 28.4ms | 0.0% | 8 | 9 | 31 |
| 4 | Alibaba | Hong Kong (HK) | 39.0ms | 30.1ms | 0.1% | 8 | 11 | 78 |
| 5 | AWS | Hong Kong (HK) | 57.6ms | 42.1ms | 2.8% | 10 | 13 | 128 |
| 6 | Oracle | Osaka (JP) | 48.1ms | 43.3ms | 0.1% | 8 | 11 | 149 |
| 7 | GCP | Osaka (JP) | 51.4ms | 45.9ms | 0.1% | 8 | 11 | 125 |
| 8 | Azure | Hong Kong (HK) | 46.7ms | 50.3ms | 2.7% | 10 | 13 | 121 |
| 9 | Oracle | Seoul (KR) | 67.3ms | 51.6ms | 0.9% | 8 | 11 | 121 |
| 10 | Azure | Tokyo (JP) | 51.4ms | 51.9ms | 0.0% | 9 | 13 | 125 |
| 11 | GCP | Tokyo (JP) | 48.4ms | 52.4ms | 0.1% | 8 | 11 | 121 |
| 12 | Azure | Singapore (SG) | 57.4ms | 52.6ms | 2.2% | 10 | 13 | 70 |
| 13 | AWS | Taipei (TW) | 66.5ms | 54.0ms | 4.4% | 10 | 13 | 115 |
| 14 | GCP | Singapore (SG) | 66.5ms | 54.2ms | 0.0% | 8 | 11 | 65 |
| 15 | Huawei | Singapore (SG) | 68.8ms | 55.0ms | 1.1% | 10 | 12 | 46 |
| 16 | Azure | Seoul (KR) | 55.7ms | 55.0ms | 2.8% | 10 | 13 | 122 |
| 17 | Tencent | Hong Kong (HK) | 69.5ms | 55.3ms | 2.1% | 10 | 13 | 77 |
| 18 | AWS | Tokyo (JP) | 55.4ms | 55.6ms | 0.2% | 9 | 13 | 125 |
| 19 | Alibaba | Manila (PH) | 63.4ms | 57.5ms | 0.2% | 8 | 11 | 77 |
| 20 | GCP | Seoul (KR) | 56.6ms | 57.7ms | 0.1% | 8 | 11 | 120 |
排行月份: 2026 年 8 月 · 更新于: 2026-11-03arrow_back返回全球排行榜