东亚 最快云区域排行 — 2026 年 9 月
月度按到 东亚 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于 2026 年 9 月、全球 1000+ 城市的全部测量数据，每月 1 日发布上月排行。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 东亚 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | ASN 数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AWS | Hong Kong (HK) | 29.0ms | 26.7ms | 0.0% | 7 | 11 | 108 |
| 2 | GCP | Hong Kong (HK) | 32.4ms | 27.5ms | 0.1% | 7 | 11 | 104 |
| 3 | Alibaba | Hong Kong (HK) | 36.7ms | 33.1ms | 0.4% | 7 | 11 | 94 |
| 4 | Tencent | Hong Kong (HK) | 36.3ms | 33.1ms | 0.0% | 7 | 9 | 91 |
| 5 | Huawei | Hong Kong (HK) | 33.4ms | 33.5ms | 0.3% | 6 | 10 | 110 |
| 6 | GCP | Changhua County (TW) | 47.8ms | 39.8ms | 0.3% | 7 | 11 | 119 |
| 7 | Azure | Seoul (KR) | 39.1ms | 40.5ms | 0.1% | 7 | 11 | 132 |
| 8 | Alibaba | Tokyo (JP) | 44.6ms | 40.8ms | 0.4% | 7 | 10 | 126 |
| 9 | AWS | Tokyo (JP) | 42.4ms | 41.3ms | 0.1% | 7 | 11 | 132 |
| 10 | Azure | Hong Kong (HK) | 41.5ms | 41.4ms | 0.3% | 7 | 11 | 125 |
| 11 | Tencent | Tokyo (JP) | 42.6ms | 41.7ms | 0.5% | 7 | 11 | 133 |
| 12 | Azure | Tokyo (JP) | 36.5ms | 42.0ms | 0.1% | 7 | 11 | 132 |
| 13 | AWS | Taipei (TW) | 38.1ms | 42.1ms | 0.3% | 7 | 11 | 125 |
| 14 | AWS | Osaka (JP) | 43.6ms | 43.9ms | 0.0% | 7 | 11 | 130 |
| 15 | Oracle | Tokyo (JP) | 40.9ms | 43.9ms | 0.1% | 7 | 11 | 131 |
| 16 | Oracle | Osaka (JP) | 49.1ms | 45.8ms | 0.5% | 7 | 11 | 141 |
| 17 | GCP | Osaka (JP) | 59.1ms | 46.6ms | 0.5% | 7 | 11 | 110 |
| 18 | Azure | Singapore (SG) | 53.4ms | 53.6ms | 0.0% | 7 | 9 | 79 |
| 19 | Tencent | Singapore (SG) | 61.8ms | 54.3ms | 0.0% | 7 | 9 | 81 |
| 20 | AWS | Seoul (KR) | 50.2ms | 54.5ms | 0.1% | 7 | 11 | 131 |
排行月份: 2026 年 9 月 · 更新于: 2026-11-03arrow_back返回全球排行榜