西欧 最快云区域排行
每日按到 西欧 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于最新一天、全球 900+ 城市的测量数据。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 西欧 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AWS | Frankfurt (DE) | 14.9ms | 14.0ms | 0.0% | 29 | 29 |
| 2 | Oracle | Frankfurt (Germany) | 14.3ms | 14.1ms | 0.0% | 29 | 29 |
| 3 | Azure | Frankfurt | 14.4ms | 14.2ms | 0.0% | 26 | 26 |
| 4 | Tencent | Frankfurt (DE) | 14.5ms | 14.4ms | 0.0% | 26 | 26 |
| 5 | GCP | Frankfurt(DE) | 15.4ms | 15.3ms | 0.0% | 25 | 25 |
| 6 | Azure | Brussels | 15.4ms | 15.4ms | 0.0% | 28 | 28 |
| 7 | Azure | Paris | 15.8ms | 15.7ms | 0.0% | 27 | 27 |
| 8 | AWS | Paris (FR) | 16.6ms | 16.5ms | 0.2% | 26 | 26 |
| 9 | AWS | Milan (IT) | 16.6ms | 16.6ms | 0.0% | 25 | 25 |
| 10 | GCP | Paris(FR) | 17.2ms | 17.1ms | 0.0% | 26 | 26 |
| 11 | Azure | Netherlands | 17.2ms | 17.2ms | 0.0% | 28 | 28 |
| 12 | Alibaba | Frankfurt (DE) | 17.6ms | 17.5ms | 0.0% | 28 | 28 |
| 13 | AWS | Zurich(CH) | 18.3ms | 18.1ms | 0.0% | 25 | 25 |
| 14 | GCP | Eemshaven(NL) | 19.0ms | 19.0ms | 0.0% | 29 | 29 |
| 15 | Oracle | Zurich (Switzerland) | 19.5ms | 19.4ms | 0.0% | 28 | 28 |
| 16 | Azure | Zurich | 19.9ms | 19.5ms | 0.0% | 24 | 24 |
| 17 | GCP | St. Ghislain(BE) | 19.7ms | 19.6ms | 0.0% | 26 | 26 |
| 18 | AWS | London (UK) | 20.0ms | 19.7ms | 0.0% | 27 | 27 |
| 19 | Oracle | Amsterdam (Netherlands) | 19.9ms | 19.8ms | 0.0% | 30 | 30 |
| 20 | GCP | Zurich(CH) | 20.0ms | 19.9ms | 0.0% | 26 | 26 |
更新于: 2026-10-15arrow_back返回全球排行榜