中国台湾 最快云区域排行 — 2026 年 6 月
月度按到 中国台湾 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于 2026 年 6 月、全球 1000+ 城市的全部测量数据，每月 1 日发布上月排行。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 中国台湾 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | ASN 数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AWS | Taipei (TW) | 6.0ms | 4.5ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 2 | GCP | Changhua County (TW) | 8.7ms | 7.8ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 3 | Azure | Hong Kong (HK) | 19.5ms | 17.5ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 51 |
| 4 | AWS | Hong Kong (HK) | 21.9ms | 18.2ms | 0.4% | 8 | 0 | 46 |
| 5 | GCP | Hong Kong (HK) | 26.7ms | 25.9ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 6 | Alibaba | Hong Kong (HK) | 30.2ms | 29.4ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 7 | Huawei | Hong Kong (HK) | 36.5ms | 31.5ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 8 | Azure | Tokyo (JP) | 35.8ms | 33.7ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 51 |
| 9 | Oracle | Tokyo (JP) | 46.8ms | 35.3ms | 0.3% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 10 | AWS | Tokyo (JP) | 37.5ms | 35.5ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 11 | AWS | Osaka (JP) | 39.5ms | 37.6ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 47 |
| 12 | Tencent | Tokyo (JP) | 45.1ms | 39.4ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 13 | GCP | Tokyo (JP) | 47.1ms | 40.2ms | 0.1% | 8 | 0 | 49 |
| 14 | Alibaba | Tokyo (JP) | 53.1ms | 40.6ms | 0.1% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 15 | Huawei | Manila (PH) | 52.0ms | 47.2ms | 0.6% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 16 | Azure | Singapore (SG) | 49.3ms | 47.9ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 31 |
| 17 | GCP | Osaka (JP) | 54.4ms | 49.7ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 18 | Tencent | Hong Kong (HK) | 46.9ms | 51.7ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 48 |
| 19 | Azure | Seoul (KR) | 51.4ms | 52.0ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 51 |
| 20 | Azure | Kuala Lumpur (MY) | 52.9ms | 52.0ms | 0.0% | 8 | 0 | 31 |
排行月份: 2026 年 6 月 · 更新于: 2026-11-03arrow_back返回全球排行榜