中国台湾 最快云区域排行 — 2026 年 10 月
月度按到 中国台湾 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于 2026 年 10 月、全球 1000+ 城市的全部测量数据，每月 1 日发布上月排行。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 中国台湾 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | ASN 数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AWS | Taipei (TW) | 8.4ms | 5.1ms | 0.2% | 8 | 7 | 124 |
| 2 | GCP | Changhua County (TW) | 11.5ms | 7.6ms | 0.1% | 8 | 7 | 124 |
| 3 | AWS | Hong Kong (HK) | 27.8ms | 19.8ms | 0.1% | 8 | 7 | 124 |
| 4 | Huawei | Hong Kong (HK) | 25.3ms | 26.1ms | 0.0% | 8 | 7 | 23 |
| 5 | GCP | Hong Kong (HK) | 31.0ms | 27.4ms | 0.3% | 8 | 7 | 125 |
| 6 | Alibaba | Hong Kong (HK) | 33.3ms | 29.4ms | 0.2% | 8 | 7 | 125 |
| 7 | Azure | Seoul (KR) | 33.3ms | 29.4ms | 0.4% | 8 | 7 | 125 |
| 8 | Tencent | Hong Kong (HK) | 42.0ms | 32.3ms | 0.2% | 8 | 7 | 125 |
| 9 | Azure | Tokyo (JP) | 39.2ms | 34.6ms | 0.2% | 8 | 7 | 125 |
| 10 | Oracle | Tokyo (JP) | 47.3ms | 37.0ms | 0.2% | 8 | 7 | 125 |
| 11 | AWS | Tokyo (JP) | 42.3ms | 37.4ms | 0.3% | 8 | 7 | 125 |
| 12 | Alibaba | Tokyo (JP) | 46.2ms | 37.6ms | 0.2% | 8 | 7 | 125 |
| 13 | Tencent | Tokyo (JP) | 44.5ms | 39.5ms | 0.3% | 8 | 7 | 125 |
| 14 | Azure | Osaka (JP) | 45.6ms | 40.8ms | 0.4% | 8 | 7 | 93 |
| 15 | Azure | Singapore (SG) | 53.7ms | 49.2ms | 0.0% | 8 | 7 | 47 |
| 16 | GCP | Osaka (JP) | 64.3ms | 50.7ms | 0.1% | 8 | 7 | 103 |
| 17 | AWS | Osaka (JP) | 46.8ms | 51.1ms | 0.4% | 8 | 7 | 124 |
| 18 | Alibaba | Guangzhou (CN) | 98.1ms | 52.9ms | 13.2% | 8 | 7 | 48 |
| 19 | GCP | Tokyo (JP) | 57.6ms | 53.5ms | 0.2% | 8 | 7 | 124 |
| 20 | Azure | Kuala Lumpur (MY) | 57.3ms | 53.9ms | 0.0% | 8 | 7 | 47 |
排行月份: 2026 年 10 月 · 更新于: 2026-11-03arrow_back返回全球排行榜