荷兰 最快云区域排行
每日按到 荷兰 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于最新一天、全球 900+ 城市的测量数据。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 荷兰 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Azure | Netherlands | 5.4ms | 5.3ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 2 | Oracle | Amsterdam (Netherlands) | 7.0ms | 6.6ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 3 | GCP | Eemshaven(NL) | 8.8ms | 8.7ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 4 | Azure | Brussels | 9.5ms | 9.4ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 5 | AWS | Frankfurt (DE) | 10.8ms | 10.6ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 6 | Azure | Frankfurt | 11.3ms | 11.1ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 7 | Oracle | Frankfurt (Germany) | 11.5ms | 11.2ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 8 | GCP | Frankfurt(DE) | 11.5ms | 11.4ms | 1.8% | 11 | 11 |
| 9 | Tencent | Frankfurt (DE) | 11.8ms | 11.5ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 10 | GCP | London(GB) | 11.8ms | 11.7ms | 1.2% | 11 | 11 |
| 11 | AWS | London (UK) | 11.9ms | 11.7ms | 0.6% | 11 | 11 |
| 12 | Oracle | London (UK) | 12.0ms | 11.8ms | 1.8% | 11 | 11 |
| 13 | Azure | London | 12.1ms | 12.0ms | 0.0% | 10 | 10 |
| 14 | Alibaba | Frankfurt (DE) | 12.4ms | 12.3ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 15 | Azure | Paris | 13.9ms | 13.8ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 16 | Alibaba | London (GB) | 14.1ms | 13.8ms | 1.8% | 11 | 11 |
| 17 | GCP | St. Ghislain(BE) | 14.2ms | 14.2ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 18 | GCP | Paris(FR) | 14.6ms | 14.4ms | 4.2% | 11 | 11 |
| 19 | Alibaba | Paris (FR) | 16.6ms | 16.4ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 20 | Azure | Copenhagen | 16.7ms | 16.6ms | 0.0% | 11 | 11 |
更新于: 2026-10-12arrow_back返回全球排行榜