荷兰 最快云区域排行
每日按到 荷兰 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域,基于最新一天、全球 900+ 城市的测量数据。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云,为 荷兰 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Azure | West Europe | 7.4ms | 6.9ms | 3.0% | 18 | 18 |
| 2 | Oracle | Amsterdam (Netherlands) | 7.9ms | 7.7ms | 0.0% | 18 | 18 |
| 3 | Azure | Brussels | 10.6ms | 10.4ms | 2.2% | 18 | 18 |
| 4 | GCP | Eemshaven(NL) | 11.2ms | 10.4ms | 2.2% | 18 | 18 |
| 5 | AWS | Frankfurt (DE) | 12.3ms | 11.9ms | 0.0% | 18 | 18 |
| 6 | Azure | Frankfurt | 12.8ms | 12.3ms | 0.0% | 18 | 18 |
| 7 | Oracle | Frankfurt (Germany) | 12.8ms | 12.4ms | 0.0% | 18 | 18 |
| 8 | Tencent | Frankfurt (DE) | 13.0ms | 12.9ms | 0.0% | 18 | 18 |
| 9 | AWS | London (UK) | 13.4ms | 13.0ms | 0.7% | 18 | 18 |
| 10 | Azure | UK South | 13.8ms | 13.4ms | 0.0% | 18 | 18 |
| 11 | Alibaba | Frankfurt (DE) | 14.4ms | 13.7ms | 0.4% | 18 | 18 |
| 12 | GCP | London(GB) | 14.2ms | 13.7ms | 0.7% | 18 | 18 |
| 13 | Oracle | London (UK) | 14.0ms | 13.8ms | 0.4% | 18 | 18 |
| 14 | GCP | Frankfurt(DE) | 15.4ms | 15.1ms | 1.9% | 18 | 18 |
| 15 | Alibaba | London (GB) | 15.6ms | 15.3ms | 0.4% | 18 | 18 |
| 16 | Azure | Paris | 15.6ms | 15.3ms | 0.4% | 18 | 18 |
| 17 | GCP | Paris(FR) | 15.9ms | 15.7ms | 0.4% | 18 | 18 |
| 18 | GCP | St. Ghislain(BE) | 16.7ms | 15.9ms | 0.4% | 18 | 18 |
| 19 | Oracle | Paris (FR) | 17.1ms | 16.6ms | 0.0% | 15 | 15 |
| 20 | Azure | Zurich | 17.4ms | 17.4ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
更新于: 2026-10-20arrow_back返回全球排行榜