新西兰 最快云区域排行
每日按到 新西兰 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于最新一天、全球 900+ 城市的测量数据。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 新西兰 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Azure | Auckland | 9.5ms | 9.4ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | Azure | New South Wales | 33.1ms | 33.0ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 3 | AWS | Sydney (AU) | 33.5ms | 33.4ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 4 | Oracle | Sydney (Australia) | 34.3ms | 34.3ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 5 | AWS | Melbourne (AU) | 44.7ms | 44.7ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 6 | Oracle | Melbourne (Australia) | 47.3ms | 47.3ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 7 | GCP | Sydney(AU) | 61.2ms | 61.1ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 8 | GCP | Melbourne(AU) | 73.9ms | 73.8ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 9 | AWS | N. California (US) | 148.7ms | 148.5ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 10 | AWS | Oregon (US) | 150.0ms | 150.0ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 11 | Alibaba | Silicon Valley (US) | 154.1ms | 154.0ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 12 | GCP | Tokyo(JP) | 157.8ms | 157.2ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 13 | GCP | Osaka(JP) | 158.8ms | 158.8ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 14 | GCP | Hong Kong(HK) | 174.8ms | 175.0ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 15 | GCP | Changhua County(TW) | 177.0ms | 177.0ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 16 | Azure | Hong Kong SAR | 177.4ms | 177.5ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 17 | Azure | Tokyo, Saitama | 181.6ms | 178.2ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 18 | GCP | Seoul(KR) | 178.9ms | 178.8ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 19 | GCP | Singapore(SG) | 202.9ms | 203.0ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
| 20 | Azure | Singapore | 218.9ms | 218.5ms | 0.0% | 4 | 4 |
更新于: 2026-10-15arrow_back返回全球排行榜