挪威 最快云区域排行
每日按到 挪威 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于最新一天、全球 900+ 城市的测量数据。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 挪威 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Azure | Norway | 2.9ms | 2.8ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | Azure | Copenhagen | 10.5ms | 10.5ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | AWS | Stockholm (SE) | 11.4ms | 11.4ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| 4 | GCP | Stockholm(SE) | 13.7ms | 13.7ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| 5 | GCP | Hamina(FI) | 16.2ms | 16.2ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| 6 | GCP | Frankfurt(DE) | 20.4ms | 20.2ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 7 | Tencent | Frankfurt (DE) | 20.8ms | 20.6ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 8 | Oracle | Frankfurt (Germany) | 22.0ms | 22.0ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| 9 | Azure | Netherlands | 22.6ms | 22.3ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 10 | Alibaba | Frankfurt (DE) | 22.8ms | 22.9ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| 11 | GCP | Eemshaven(NL) | 23.6ms | 23.1ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 12 | Azure | London | 23.2ms | 23.1ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 13 | AWS | Frankfurt (DE) | 23.9ms | 23.6ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 14 | Oracle | Amsterdam (Netherlands) | 24.0ms | 23.9ms | 0.0% | 2 | 2 |
| 15 | GCP | Berlin(DE) | 25.0ms | 24.8ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 16 | Azure | Warsaw | 26.2ms | 26.0ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 17 | Azure | Frankfurt | 26.6ms | 26.4ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 18 | GCP | Warsaw(PL) | 27.1ms | 27.0ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 19 | Azure | Brussels | 28.2ms | 28.0ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 20 | GCP | London(GB) | 28.4ms | 28.2ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
更新于: 2026-09-04arrow_back返回全球排行榜