韩国 最快云区域排行
每日按到 韩国 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于最新一天、全球 900+ 城市的测量数据。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 韩国 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oracle | Seoul (Korea) | 2.5ms | 2.5ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | GCP | Seoul(KR) | 3.1ms | 3.1ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | Tencent | Seoul (KR) | 3.1ms | 3.1ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | Alibaba | Seoul (KR) | 3.2ms | 3.2ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | Azure | Seoul | 3.5ms | 3.4ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 6 | AWS | Seoul (KR) | 4.3ms | 4.3ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 7 | Oracle | Osaka (Japan) | 29.7ms | 29.0ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 8 | Azure | Tokyo, Saitama | 30.8ms | 29.6ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 9 | Alibaba | Shanghai (CN) | 30.6ms | 30.6ms | 13.3% | 1 | 1 |
| 10 | GCP | Osaka(JP) | 31.0ms | 31.0ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 11 | GCP | Tokyo(JP) | 32.6ms | 32.4ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 12 | Alibaba | Tokyo (JP) | 33.3ms | 33.1ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 13 | Oracle | Tokyo (Japan) | 34.3ms | 33.4ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 14 | AWS | Tokyo (JP) | 34.6ms | 34.5ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 15 | AWS | Osaka (JP) | 34.8ms | 34.8ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 16 | Tencent | Tokyo (JP) | 35.6ms | 35.4ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 17 | AWS | Hong Kong (HK) | 37.9ms | 37.3ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 18 | Huawei | Hong Kong (CN) | 38.7ms | 38.6ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 19 | Azure | Hong Kong SAR | 39.0ms | 38.8ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
| 20 | Tencent | Hong kong(CN) | 40.0ms | 39.8ms | 0.0% | 1 | 1 |
更新于: 2026-09-04arrow_back返回全球排行榜