Best Cloud Regions for Eastern Asia — July 2026
MonthlyCloud regions ranked by lowest median latency to Eastern Asia, based on all of July 2026's measurements across 1000+ cities worldwide. Published on the 1st of each month for the previous month. Compare AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle, Tencent, Huawei and Alibaba to pick the fastest region for Eastern Asia.
| Rank | Provider | Region Name | Avg Latency | Median Latency | Loss | Cities | ASN Count | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GCP | Seoul (KR) | 39.8ms | 29.2ms | 0.0% | 15 | 12 | 177 |
| 2 | Huawei | Hong Kong (HK) | 37.5ms | 32.6ms | 0.0% | 15 | 11 | 117 |
| 3 | GCP | Tokyo (JP) | 40.5ms | 34.1ms | 0.0% | 15 | 11 | 180 |
| 4 | GCP | Changhua County (TW) | 36.8ms | 35.0ms | 0.0% | 15 | 11 | 173 |
| 5 | Oracle | Osaka (JP) | 43.5ms | 35.2ms | 0.1% | 15 | 11 | 197 |
| 6 | GCP | Osaka (JP) | 39.1ms | 36.0ms | 0.1% | 15 | 11 | 187 |
| 7 | GCP | Hong Kong (HK) | 35.0ms | 36.3ms | 0.0% | 15 | 11 | 143 |
| 8 | AWS | Tokyo (JP) | 42.1ms | 36.5ms | 0.2% | 19 | 15 | 227 |
| 9 | Oracle | Seoul (KR) | 48.8ms | 36.9ms | 0.2% | 15 | 11 | 172 |
| 10 | AWS | Osaka (JP) | 41.2ms | 37.1ms | 0.1% | 19 | 15 | 247 |
| 11 | Alibaba | Hong Kong (HK) | 45.3ms | 37.4ms | 0.2% | 15 | 11 | 117 |
| 12 | Alibaba | Seoul (KR) | 45.1ms | 38.5ms | 0.6% | 19 | 16 | 226 |
| 13 | Azure | Hong Kong (HK) | 40.8ms | 38.9ms | 0.5% | 19 | 14 | 172 |
| 14 | Azure | Seoul (KR) | 43.0ms | 39.1ms | 0.4% | 19 | 14 | 204 |
| 15 | Tencent | Tokyo (JP) | 52.0ms | 40.5ms | 1.1% | 19 | 13 | 201 |
| 16 | Azure | Tokyo (JP) | 44.7ms | 41.1ms | 0.3% | 19 | 15 | 222 |
| 17 | AWS | Hong Kong (HK) | 42.8ms | 41.7ms | 1.0% | 18 | 13 | 155 |
| 18 | AWS | Seoul (KR) | 50.4ms | 44.1ms | 0.1% | 19 | 15 | 225 |
| 19 | Alibaba | Tokyo (JP) | 59.3ms | 44.6ms | 1.3% | 19 | 15 | 207 |
| 20 | Tencent | Hong Kong (HK) | 62.3ms | 47.0ms | 0.6% | 19 | 13 | 144 |
Ranking month: July 2026 · Updated: 2026-11-03arrow_backBack to global leaderboards