东亚 最快云区域排行
每日按到 东亚 的中位延迟最低排序的云区域，基于最新一天、全球 900+ 城市的测量数据。对比 AWS、Azure、GCP、Oracle、腾讯、华为、阿里云，为 东亚 选择最快的区域。
| 排名 | 提供商 | 区域名称 | 平均延迟 | 中位延迟 | 丢包率 | 城市数 | 样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AWS | Osaka (JP) | 47.7ms | 47.9ms | 0.0% | 8 | 8 |
| 2 | AWS | Hong Kong (HK) | 54.3ms | 54.2ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 3 | AWS | Seoul (KR) | 62.4ms | 62.3ms | 0.0% | 8 | 8 |
| 4 | AWS | Singapore (SG) | 67.1ms | 67.1ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 5 | Oracle | Tokyo (Japan) | 76.3ms | 76.5ms | 2.8% | 7 | 7 |
| 6 | Huawei | Jakarta (ID) | 77.5ms | 76.6ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 7 | Alibaba | Tokyo (JP) | 78.7ms | 79.1ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 8 | Alibaba | Jakarta (ID) | 80.9ms | 80.5ms | 0.0% | 3 | 3 |
| 9 | Huawei | Bangkok (TH) | 99.5ms | 99.5ms | 0.0% | 6 | 6 |
| 10 | Alibaba | Ulanqab (CN) | 108.0ms | 104.8ms | 4.4% | 7 | 7 |
| 11 | AWS | Beijing (CN) | 110.4ms | 107.1ms | 0.0% | 8 | 8 |
| 12 | AWS | Ningxia (CN) | 125.5ms | 115.6ms | 1.7% | 8 | 8 |
| 13 | Alibaba | Chengdu (CN) | 123.5ms | 123.4ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 14 | Azure | Kuala Lumpur | 133.9ms | 133.6ms | 0.0% | 5 | 5 |
| 15 | Azure | New South Wales | 152.5ms | 152.3ms | 0.0% | 7 | 7 |
| 16 | Huawei | Guangzhou (CN) | 164.8ms | 165.8ms | 5.8% | 7 | 7 |
| 17 | Tencent | Beijing(CN) | 170.9ms | 170.2ms | 1.0% | 11 | 11 |
| 18 | Huawei | Beijing (CN) | 182.0ms | 179.1ms | 3.3% | 6 | 6 |
| 19 | Huawei | Shanghai (CN) | 193.2ms | 193.9ms | 1.1% | 6 | 6 |
| 20 | Tencent | Shanghai(CN) | 209.1ms | 205.9ms | 3.3% | 8 | 8 |
更新于: 2026-10-15arrow_back返回全球排行榜